Centre Reviews Zero Percentile NEET PG Cutoff Policy Amid Medical Standard Concerns

The Union Government is officially reviewing its highly controversial decision to eliminate the minimum qualifying cutoff for postgraduate medical admissions. Initially introduced as a drastic measure to fill vacant medical seats, the “zero percentile” policy has faced immense backlash from the medical fraternity for allegedly compromising the quality of specialized healthcare.  

The Failure to Fill Seats

The primary justification for reducing the qualifying percentile to zero back in 2023 was to prevent the wastage of highly subsidized postgraduate medical seats. However, data from the 2025-2026 academic year reveals a glaring failure in this strategy: despite lowering the cutoff to absolute zero, 1,140 postgraduate seats still remained vacant.  

This massive shortfall has raised urgent concerns over the squandering of taxpayer funds. The central government spends roughly ₹1.25 crore to maintain a single postgraduate medical seat for three years. Allowing these seats to remain empty – or worse, filling them with underqualified candidates – has sparked a serious debate within the Health Ministry regarding the long-term impact on India’s medical education standards.

Also read: Merit vs Money? How -40 Marks Can Now Get You a Seat after NEET PG 2025 Revised Cutoff

The “Minus 40” Controversy

The breaking point for the medical community occurred earlier this year when the National Board of Examinations (NBE) published revised qualifying scores. The revised cut-offs were set at the 7th percentile (103 marks) for General/EWS, the 5th percentile (90 marks) for General PwBD, and a shocking 0th percentile (-40 marks) for SC/ST/OBC categories.  

Doctors immediately highlighted the absurdity of the system, pointing out that candidates scoring negative 40 marks out of 800 could technically secure admission into highly sought-after clinical specialties. Resident doctors’ associations, including FAIMA, heavily criticized the move, calling it a “blow to meritocracy” and a “direct threat to patient safety and public health”.  

A Shift Towards Merit?

Faced with mounting pressure, the Union Health Ministry is now considering scrapping the zero-percentile policy in favor of a strictly merit-based approach. According to government sources, officials are exploring the possibility of introducing a stable 40th percentile cutoff alongside a multi-tiered counseling system to handle remaining vacancies. If implemented, this would ensure that only candidates who demonstrate baseline clinical competency are allowed to train as future specialists and become doctors.

• MBBS Admission Scam: FIR Filed in Lucknow for Duping Bengal Man of ₹5 Lakh; 3 Booked
• Centre Reviews Zero Percentile NEET PG Cutoff Policy Amid Medical Standard Concerns
• NBE Releases Seat Matrix and Counselling Schedule for DNB Post Diploma Admissions 2026

The zero-percentile policy is arguably one of the most short-sighted regulatory decisions in the history of Indian medical education. You cannot mass-produce competent specialist doctors by scraping the absolute bottom of the academic barrel. If a candidate scoring negative marks is handed a scalpel or an anesthesia chart just to fill a seat, we are no longer training doctors; we are legally sanctioning medical negligence. Scrapping this disastrous policy and reinstating a standardized cutoff is not just a win for meritocracy, it is an absolute necessity to protect the lives of future patients.

This goes far beyond patient safety – it’s about the sheer disrespect to the NEET PG grind. Imagine sacrificing years of your life, sleep, and sanity to crack this brutal exam, only to watch a candidate with negative marks walk into a specialist seat. It completely devalues the hard work of meritorious aspirants. Furthermore, senior doctors are terrified this will shatter the global reputation of an Indian MD or MS. If foreign medical boards start doubting our baseline competency, it could permanently lock international doors for our young doctors. Reinstating a strict cutoff is about respecting the hustle and protecting our degrees.